London, England, &c

Updated 28JAN2000 : Initial impressions and stuff
Updated 11FEB2000 : Most of the stuff

Back to Third Bit

I'm not going to bother making a separate section for the other cities I went to and the rest of England ... especially in regional transport hubs like Reading, all the streets felt the same and all the towns have now melged into one amorphous experience. The only thing that changes is the regional distribution of newspapers, Radio Times and the TV magazine-programmes; the only thing that's stood out for me is the amount of begging going on in Oxford. Otherwise, think of the subrurban towns and high streets in London just like the "country" towns in England. (Except that the London high streets always have a tube station every 2 blocks ... and the buses in the country towns, even the double-decker ones, only have one door ... hello?!)

In fact, I kind of doubt there is any real "country" like Australia. You have bugger-all chance of getting lost beyond the reach of humanity, and before you know it you'll come across a walking track, a motorway, or both. You know, it probably really is just fine to take your tin-pot two-door towncar for a "country" drive in England (since you can't actually drive all day and night, unless you catch a ferry or something), unlike in Australia we're you'd be crazy to leave town without something reliable!! In case you ever break down, you really have to be prepared!

| Weather | Town | Tube | Cars | TV | Newspapers | Food | Music

Big Mac Meal Index
Sydney Big Mac Meal (medium)In UK PoundsLondon Big Mac MealIncluding taxCost of Living vs Sydney
$4.55£1.82£2.9917.5% (included)65% higher
 
Before I get started, just let me have a whinge about the weather here ... it's not much of a whinge, actually (considering what Sydney's been going through in the last few weeks); but who were all these people warning me about the cold, cold weather?! It's positively balmy (barmy?) here! I am seriously overpacked, and at times, overdressed. (The big danger is the complacency this can cause ... plus, the fact that so many people turn their central heating right up! Must be the same crowd who think the Millenium Dome is cold). I expected that changing hemispheres in mid-season would cause problems -- but L.A. is bugger-all different to Sydney, especially considering how mild Sydney was in December -- so then I prepared for another cold transition when changing to the east-coast US -- and yes, okay, there was snow, thankyou -- but that was more fun than annoying (for me, I suppose!) since the wind was so low and the snow was just drifting to the ground like crazy ... I'm not complaining. Next I go to Washington, which was milder again, no snow. So then I go to London, which is much further north than even Boston, and it's been mild all this time! (The taxicab drivers have informed me that this has been a funny winter). There was snow on December 15 but no sign since, barring a bit of sleet once and some frost. Finally I expected Cambridge or Oxford (or Exeter) to provide some colder whether, but it just wasn't to be. Most of the time you could get away with clothing you'd expect on a "wintery" or "cold" day in Sydney (when, I suppose, you could expect the locals to whinge about it).

The big problem is, if you're one of those luke-warm blooded little people who need to wear gloves outdoors, you can get all rugged up and fine, but when you walk inside somewhere (like some shops on Oxford Circus) and you have to strip right down. Otherwise, you'll become overheated and when you go straight out again your system will be so shut-down that you can't warm up again! I think, this is one of those climactic problems that Australians never encounter. (Elizabeth says, though, that she might getting used to it over time).

So next week I might go oop narth just to find out for sure. They got snow in Scotland on Saturday the 12th. But anyway, what's London like?


 
London feels very familiar, just bigger, and smaller; I mean, more active, but cozier; let me explain ...


 
So the fast food here tastes almost exactly the same as Sydney ... Eating out always seems a battle to find a meal under £5 ... and get your drinks included. Starting at the bottom :-) very unfussy people like me can get fed at the golden arches or Colonel Sanders for £3 to £3.50. The only other way to do that is to find a chainstore or cafe that sells a pizza for £5 or £6 and split it between you. Cafes usually give you something or other for £4.50 and you usually get away under £6 after a smallish-sized drink (so, don't forget to ask for no ice!) Gratuities normally aren't a problem, although some places, eg around Covent Garden, which remind me of Darlinghurst strip cafes, do tell you so at the counter.

Then there's a restaurant chain known as Garfunkels, which does a very nice stuff-yourself-silly deal for £5 including one drink, in which you get to load your plate once at the salad bar (I think I managed to make the world's first "meat salad") and you get to pick any pasta dish or any of the 9-inch pizzas as part of the deal. Unfortunately, this is only a lunchtime offer, like Pizza Hut's one. Pizza Hut just isn't economical to do take-away (I don't really think I got any discount for doing the pick-up), no matter which way you do the sums (I had 15 minutes to mull this one over). You're better off getting a £1.50 shrinkwrapped pizza from Safeways. Now there is a pretty conspicuous shop in the Soho district which displays on human-sized banners "£3 Pizzas 11 inches" and "£1.50 Jacket Potatos 2 toppings". Good stuff. These prices are almost normal (to me!)

Spuds -- this must be the spud capital of the world. Except here they call them jacket potatoes, which is the real name after all. This has been an interesting way for me to get a good meal regularly, thank goodness. You'll find caravan-trailer outlets everywhere, and they'll be on the menus at almost every pub and cafe. Good thing.



I should dedicate a whole section here to the tube ... it's a lot of fun as long as you remember that they charge prices to make a profit, and you don't mind the kind of pedestrian tunnels they have at Central and the kind of escalators they have on the Eastern Suburbs line.


 
Two things in England are noticably ahead of Australia: First of all, the cars aren't just newer generally (fewer second-hand ones, which is an oddity in Australia), but they've got a handful of models lately which I've never seen before ... and when they drive past, I go "wooooahh". I'm not just talking about the Mercedes Benz A-Class or the new Volkswagen Beetle: That's fabulously common here (although it's also too expensive for the average person). They also have had the Ford Ka for a while now, which some Australians may have noticed on posters. But my favourite is the Ford Focus, a nice 3-door or 5-door job which makes most 90s-model cars look jaded. It's all part of the new look which Ford is getting internationally, what with the smart-style headlights and high-rise taillights. Plus there's one other car of note, only known as "Smart" -- no other badging, and a bit of a mystery. I've been told it's part electric or something. I did find one in Mayfair, that had some promotional labelling from Mercedes Benz on it.

The other factor with the cars here is probably the emphasis on making "small" cars (3 or 5 door) that people will be satisfied with. And you notice that the equivalent models to some of our Commodores (Vauxhall Carlton and Omega) and Falcons (Ford Granada), especially the rolling box which was our XD model of the early 80s, seems strangely subtler and not as bulky in England. I don't know what it is! It could be smaller dimensions or just a trick of the sculpting.

Television is also striding ahead in this country, right now -- which makes a change from the US jumping the gun. This is the only country which is actually selling digital receivers and widescreen-digital receivers to the consumer at any serious pace. Australia won't be far behind, since we'll be using the same DVB terestrial transmission system within 12 months. (Except Australia will have mandated HDTV transmission for 20 hours per week, not that that should affect the price of the receiver, but that's another story). You can sign up for a free reciver + subscription costs from a certain provider, who will give you a box that simply plugs into your aerial, no satellite or cable required. Although satellite and cable also have their own digital channels. But the government has told all the stations that they have to transmit wide screen digital by 2005, so all programs are going that way. The Bill has already. The BBC is now transmitting three or four new channels, and only on digital, so if you want to see them (and they're all included in the licence fee), then get a digital decoder or a digital receiver. Meantime, the BBC is on the verge of developing a digital TV detector ... to put in its detector vans! Yes, they still have TV licences -- I have a TV licence stamp booklet from the Post Office to prove it!

The wide-screen conversion is an interesting development in itself. You can see when a programme is going out digitally (ie, widescreen), when they put subtle black bars at the top and bottom of the picture. For instance, just before The Bill starts, the station ID will flick into wide-screen mode. Some of you may have noticed this already if you've seen BBC World on satellite in Australia. This is basically the 16:9 -> 4:3 conversion option of least impact, by doing the letterboxing to a very small degree and then hacking off bits from the sides (this is all for the analogue simulcast); eventually the TV directors and everybody can stop sorrying about "will it actually fit in the picture?" once analogue trasmissions cease. Unless they want to worry about American markets. Anyway, a curious side-benefit to this is the sharper picture you get out of the conversion process, apart from the superior quality of end-to-end digital production: Because the letterboxing involves a "zooming out" to fit more of the sides in, you get a nice oversampled image out of it. It sounds like no big deal until you see how it compares to the old bog-standard PAL cameras. Effectively, what you're getting here is slightly-HDTV for free: The extra definition comes in the form of additional image area on the sides, but in the name of getting it onto your 4:3 set, it becomes a higher vertical resolution. Apparent, I should say; it's the same sort of thing as you get when converting from PAL 625 -> NTSC 525. Except you don't get any weird side-effects when going from 16:9 625 -> 4:3 625 (using only around 550 lines or so), unless you see an image that was full of sharp horizontal stripes and they turn into anti-aliased moires. The only time this doesn't work as well, is when a widescreen programme needs to use 4:3 images for some reason (eg home video footage); they perform a bit of zoom and stretch on it, and the end result is a bit blurry, even when going back to a 4:3 TV.

Meantime, it's been fun getting to watch The Eddie & Rosie Show, er I mean, The Bill a whole two years ahead in the storyline ... or actually, it's a little bit of a worry at times. A few of the senior characters are just wrinklier and greyer on top; though Polly is actually looking better than she did in the 1998 episodes (showing at the moment in Australia). There's a few new faces on the scene who are just pretty generic, so I can't describe them here really, except maybe the new WPC with the Liverpool accent. The detective who took the bribe money in a 1997 episode (shown last year in Australia) is still there, and the plot just seems to be gaining momentum but that's because they had a small re-entry into it in a 1998 episode I saw last December, and then they covered it again in February 2000 ... nothing seems to have changed, except that the other detective seems to have sussed onto him long ago (by now) and they have both talked about it before. So there must be another episode where something goes down, he may even admit it off the record, but the other DI can't pin him on it. Anyway, generally, the plotlines have well and truly settled into their 50-minute format (which, with 2 commercial breaks, makes an exact hour), and are probably losing their pace compared to the 25-minute days.


 
Oasis (the band) seem to be having a lot of trouble coming back, in the face of all the dance music lately. I seem to be hearing more and more of it -- is it that I'm in London, or in internet cafes, or is it only a sign of the times? The thing is, I'm enjoying it, and not sure why, because I never like it much before -- it must be maturing -- and is it only me or has anyone noticed the number of remixes and cover versions of songs that are being turned into dance tracks at the moment? That's the thing: You take a hit from, oh, say 3 months ago, and remix it into a dance theme, and re-release it ... all of a sudden, the song which is not selling anymore (but is still popular), is back on the charts again.

Then again, perhaps just a whole decade of having this thrust in my ears has taken its effect? Ha, I bet going to the gym remains an eardrum-jarring experience.

Internet cafes here are few and far between ... the phenomenon that swept Sydney's haymarket district, where all the computer shops morphed into internet cafes, hasn't happened in many other places by the looks of it. There are a few tiny places all over London, and Cambridge and Oxford seem to have just one decent store each; they all close around 8pm and charge ridiculous "CHEAP!" rates of around 12p / min or 6p / min if you fill in their questionnaire. That translates to nearly $AUD10 per hour!

The one I'm going to most often here, belongs to the "easy" group of companies (think Virgin-esque), where everything is orange. Basically, what they've done, is kitted out 5 big buildings around London, put in rows and rows of veneer benches with 15" LCD monitors, installed some active-desktop software on Win95 that takes up a chunk of your screen permanently to tell you what your remaining time is, and done that with 2,500 PCs around London. (Basically you don't see the PCs, just the keyboard, mouse, audio in/out and a USB port on the veneer panel). There are 500 PCs in this store at Trafalgar Square alone; this kind of thing is something I haven't seen at home or in America (maybe I didn't look -- but then you can get free access if you try).

The rates are basically determined around £1; you get to deposit as many pounds onto your ticket as you like, but at any given time, it says on screen, "£1 buys you 50 mins" or "1 hour" or whatever. If you stay until 11pm or midnight, people have left the store and it goes all happy-hour, dropping to "£1 buys you 4 hours" ... heck that's nearly as cheap as the best Chinatown rate in Sydney ;)

As I type this, I have been mucking around with the yuppie-as-all-hell feature on the time-remaining bar, the coffee-cup icon. Basically, in the stores that contain a Nescafe Cafe, you can click on this icon to bring up a web page form that you fill in and submit for instant delivery of hot food and drink to your desk. But the bastard is broken at the moment. It was missing a Submit button, so rather than get up and walk the ten metres to the cafe counter, I saved the HTML file to the C: drive and typed in an HTML form element to make it work; stuck it into Netscape, but then it wouldn't submit because the URL was relative not absolute; so I fixed that, and everything worked fine. But my hot chocolate didn't come; they turned off their whole system tonight, boo :-]

One thing really sucks: The British keyboards. They've always had to rearrange the shift-3 key for the pound sign, but for some reason this involves putting the double-quote in the shift-2 position, putting the at-sign (argh) where shift-quote is, and creating a new hash-key next to the enter key, taking a chunk out of that one. Annoying. There's also an Alt Gr key where the second Alt key on the right of the spacebar usually is; and no, you can't use it for Alty types of things. Oh yes, shift-hash is now tilde, which means, what have they put on shift-backquote? The answer is the ¬ symbol, which seems to be saying "end of line, return" or something. What I found particularly depressing is that Mac keyboards have done exactly the same thing, when it would be perfectly easy just to use a US keyboard and type option-3 for the pound sign. Simple!



But let's talk about money. Things are expensive, okay? But there's expensive, and then there's expensive:

Things Which Cost The Same Pretty Much Everywhere (so convert to $AUD by multiplying by 2.5 and you're right) Things Which Are Increased By the Big Mac Index (basically, you'll find that $USD and £UKP figures are the same) Things Which Are Just Notoriously Expensive (the £UKP figure and $AUD are the same, effectively cost 2.5 as much!)
CDs, DVDs, videos, movie tickets, bargain-price food (Soho), discount international phone calls, Formula 1 hotels McDonald's, KFC, Garfunkels, supermarket, drinks (post-mix, pubs and cans), bargain-price internet access, Portobello Road markets, books & magazines, white goods & brown goods, youth hostels, tourist attractions Pub food, restaurants generally, Pizza Hut, Subway, London Underground tickets, intercity train tickets, petrol & diesel, haircuts(!), internet access, clothing, hotels, taxis

Note that some things are still worth getting because they were cheap in the first place: Pub food and supermarkets, for instance. It just means that Australians are probably getting away with far more than they realise. Even a full slug of a GST from 0% -> 10% (no previous wholesale tax) won't change the situation much.

Credit cards are accepted just about everywhere, as long as your transaction is over £5; the same as Sydney, really. The only exception I've encountered so far (oooh -- scary), is one store of Marks & Sparks, but I wasn't about to buy something anyway. Meanwhile, Elizabeth is running around like crazy every 3 days trying to find a Lloyd's bank or Bank of Scotland to redeem her travellers cheques; I find it much more convenient to simply use the ATMs ("cashpoints") as I would at home, and the ability to withdraw smaller amounts probably outweighs in terms of safety, the transaction cost of $1.50 I have to pay each time.

Taxis do a funny thing here (well they do a funny thing everywhere) of adding an "Extras" amount and slapping that on at the end; just when you thought a £5 note would do the trick for your 5 minute ride, it doesn't.



To put it simply, I really like this town, which has obviously been refined and redefined over and over again in its history; but the main problem is the expense and the main culprit is the exchange rate. The locals don't have a problem (and I assume they do well on overseas holidays). I guess that just means, I have to find a job here!

Back to Third Bit