[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [SLUG] Routing across ethernet and ppp?

To: "Matthew Dalton" <matthewd@nospam.research.canon.com.au>
Subject: Re: [SLUG] Routing across ethernet and ppp?
From: "Jason Lowe" <jason@nospam.instrumental-it.com>
Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 12:06:55 +1000
Cc: <slug@nospam.slug.org.au>
Sender: owner-slug@nospam.newtreno.spectrum.com.au

>Ummm... you shouldn't be using the 203.x.x.x range on your internal
>interfaces. There are designated ranges especially for this -
>192.168.x.x is the one that I use. This could be playing havoc with your
>routing as well.


I require two PC visible to the outside world. One will run mail and the
other the web server.

The PCs on the internal network all have 192.168.0.x and access the Internet
through our proxy server.


Regards,

Jason Lowe

--
SLUG - Sydney Linux Users Group Mailing List - http://www.slug.org.au
To unsubscribe send email to slug-request@nospam.slug.org.au with
unsubscribe in the text

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [SLUG] Routing across ethernet and ppp?
  - From: Terry Collins <terryc@nospam.zip.net.au>

Prev by Date: Re: [SLUG] Routing across ethernet and ppp?
Next by Date: Re: [SLUG] Routing across ethernet and ppp?
Prev by thread: Re: [SLUG] Routing across ethernet and ppp?
Next by thread: Re: [SLUG] Routing across ethernet and ppp?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread