[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [SLUG] Routing across ethernet and ppp?

To: Matthew Dalton <matthewd@nospam.research.canon.com.au>
Subject: Re: [SLUG] Routing across ethernet and ppp?
From: michaelf@nospam.mafnet.com
Date: Tue, 02 May 2000 11:57:16 +1000
Cc: Jason Lowe <jason@nospam.instrumental-it.com>, <slug@nospam.slug.org.au>
In-Reply-To: <390E3088.9036D14D@nospam.research.canon.com.au>
References: <002f01bfb3d5$1fce8f60$0500a8c0@nospam.webserver> <390E3088.9036D14D@nospam.research.canon.com.au>
Sender: owner-slug@nospam.newtreno.spectrum.com.au
User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.0

I think you'll find they have a subnet of 203.x.x.x addresses they want to use.
Thus allowing a select few of pc's on that network to have real ip's. 


Quoting Matthew Dalton <matthewd@nospam.research.canon.com.au>:

> 
> Ummm... you shouldn't be using the 203.x.x.x range on your internal
> interfaces. There are designated ranges especially for this -
> 192.168.x.x is the one that I use. This could be playing havoc with your
> routing as well.


-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: wm.mafnet.com
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux Users Group Mailing List - http://www.slug.org.au
To unsubscribe send email to slug-request@nospam.slug.org.au with
unsubscribe in the text

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [SLUG] Routing across ethernet and ppp?
  - From: Matthew Dalton <matthewd@nospam.research.canon.com.au>

References:
- [SLUG] Routing across ethernet and ppp?
  - From: "Jason Lowe" <jason@nospam.instrumental-it.com>
- Re: [SLUG] Routing across ethernet and ppp?
  - From: Matthew Dalton <matthewd@nospam.research.canon.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: [SLUG] Routing across ethernet and ppp?
Next by Date: Re: [SLUG] Routing across ethernet and ppp?
Prev by thread: Re: [SLUG] Routing across ethernet and ppp?
Next by thread: Re: [SLUG] Routing across ethernet and ppp?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread