[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [SLUG] Routing across ethernet and ppp?

To: Jason Lowe <jason@nospam.instrumental-it.com>
Subject: Re: [SLUG] Routing across ethernet and ppp?
From: Matthew Dalton <matthewd@nospam.research.canon.com.au>
Date: Tue, 02 May 2000 11:34:00 +1000
Cc: slug@nospam.slug.org.au
References: <002f01bfb3d5$1fce8f60$0500a8c0@nospam.webserver>
Sender: owner-slug@nospam.newtreno.spectrum.com.au

Jason Lowe wrote:

> Computer 1:
> * ppp0: 203.x.x.121 (Direct connection to Telstra Big Pond)
> * eth0: 203.x.x.123

Ummm... you shouldn't be using the 203.x.x.x range on your internal
interfaces. There are designated ranges especially for this -
192.168.x.x is the one that I use. This could be playing havoc with your
routing as well.

Matthew
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux Users Group Mailing List - http://www.slug.org.au
To unsubscribe send email to slug-request@nospam.slug.org.au with
unsubscribe in the text

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [SLUG] Routing across ethernet and ppp?
  - From: John Francis <jfrancis@nospam.mail.usyd.edu.au>
- Re: [SLUG] Routing across ethernet and ppp?
  - From: michaelf@nospam.mafnet.com

References:
- [SLUG] Routing across ethernet and ppp?
  - From: "Jason Lowe" <jason@nospam.instrumental-it.com>

Prev by Date: [SLUG] Routing across ethernet and ppp?
Next by Date: Re: [SLUG] Routing across ethernet and ppp?
Prev by thread: [SLUG] Routing across ethernet and ppp?
Next by thread: Re: [SLUG] Routing across ethernet and ppp?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread