[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [SLUG] MS breakup
At 12:27 AM 5/1/00 +1000, David Zverina wrote:
>John wrote:
> > Please elucidate - I thought that companies were in business to make
> > money for their shareholders, and if that effort means that a competitor
> > "goes under", then that competitor maybe wasn't all that good in the
> > beginning and maybe deserved to fail. Note that, from the judgement,
> > Microsoft has done nothing ILLEGAL (let us distinguish ILLEGAL from
> > UNETHICAL or IMMORAL for the sake of argument).
>
>Microsoft has just been found guilty of breaching the Shermann act and
>numerous state acts. If that is not by definition illegal, then I dont know
>what is ... :)
Oops... OK, I hadn't read the entire story - serves me right for writing
anti-Microsoft
email on a 'doze box, I guess...:-)
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux Users Group Mailing List - http://www.slug.org.au
To unsubscribe send email to slug-request@nospam.slug.org.au with
unsubscribe in the text