[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [SLUG] W2K Server [OT]

To: slug@nospam.slug.org.au
Subject: Re: [SLUG] W2K Server [OT]
From: Del <del@nospam.babel.com.au>
Date: Mon, 01 May 2000 19:03:17 +1200
Organization: Babel Com Australia
References: <NBBBLFOHHJENLEPGCMCCGEODECAA.aravind.naidu@nospam.software-assoc.com>
Sender: owner-slug@nospam.newtreno.spectrum.com.au

Aravind Naidu wrote:

> My impressions : Win2K is way more stable than NT, but still not in the same
> league as my Linux and AIX boxes.

Win2K professional is more stable than NT workstation.

Win2K server is way less stable than NT server.

Active Directory is highly unstable, and there are no repair
tools for it.  If your ADS dies then you rebuild it from
scratch.

----+------------------------+--------------------------
Del | mailto:del@nospam.babel.co.nz | Christchurch, New Zealand
----+------------------------+--------------------------
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux Users Group Mailing List - http://www.slug.org.au
To unsubscribe send email to slug-request@nospam.slug.org.au with
unsubscribe in the text

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [SLUG] W2K Server [OT]
  - From: "Aravind Naidu" <aravind.naidu@nospam.software-assoc.com>

References:
- RE: [SLUG] W2K Server [OT]
  - From: "Aravind Naidu" <aravind.naidu@nospam.software-assoc.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [SLUG] Breaking Up MS - The Fix Is At Hand
Next by Date: Re: [SLUG] mail
Prev by thread: RE: [SLUG] W2K Server [OT]
Next by thread: RE: [SLUG] W2K Server [OT]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread