RE: FW: [SLUG] uptimes

[George Vieira <georgev@nospam.citadelcomputer.com.au>]

Actually my real uptime is only 43 days as it was the new server added to
the network which replaced and I mean REPLACED the SCO box. We now develop
Citadel under Linux.

Problem is now that I have to down the damn thing again to add another
drive... DAMN , it's not fair.

At least I know even if I down it Linux will still beat the NT servers
uptime.. hee hee

thanks,
George Vieira
Network Administrator
Citadel Computer Systems P/L
http://www.citadelcomputer.com.au



-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Macks [mailto:andypoo@nospam.secret.com.au]
Sent: Wednesday, 28 June 2000 2:03 PM
To: slug@nospam.slug.org.au
Subject: Re: FW: [SLUG] uptimes



On Wed, 28 Jun 2000, Rachel Polanskis wrote:

> [rachel rachel]$ uptime
>  11:24am  up 320 days, 22:48,  1 user,  load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00

On Wed, 28 Jun 2000, Padmini Naidu wrote:

> [jo@nospam.sensi]$ uptime
>  11:40am  up 600 days, 21:28,  1 user,  load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00

Alright alright, now which of you are running from a residential location
without power backup? :)

Give my 260 days a break :P

Andrew.

-- 
If you are still using my old e-mail addresses, andypoo@nospam.tig.com.au
or andypoo@nospam.ihug.com.au, you should change to andypoo@nospam.secret.com.au

--
SLUG - Sydney Linux Users Group Mailing List - http://www.slug.org.au
To unsubscribe send email to slug-request@nospam.slug.org.au with
unsubscribe in the text
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux Users Group Mailing List - http://www.slug.org.au
To unsubscribe send email to slug-request@nospam.slug.org.au with
unsubscribe in the text