[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [SLUG] Hi posters.

To: slug@nospam.slug.org.au
Subject: Re: [SLUG] Hi posters.
From: Rodos <rodos@nospam.haywood.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 08:50:10 +1000 (EST)
In-Reply-To: <395871B2.2505A9FF@nospam.LinuxWorx.com.au>
Sender: owner-slug@nospam.newtreno.spectrum.com.au

On Tue, 27 Jun 2000, Matt Allen wrote:

> Now,
> 
> If we could just write a script that automatically judges an email on
> Quality of Answer .....
> 
> Hmmmm ...

Thats easy. Some huristics on the amount of new text added. How much of
the previous mail was cropped (people who don't crop by default write crap
IMHO <grin>), how many followups the message gets. Then some keyword
matches. If you use the words NT and sucks within 5 words you get more
points. If you use the words Linux and rules you get lots of points. If
you write a haiku then you get heaps of points! If you use the words
RedHat and desktop you loose points.

I will go away now.

Rodos

-- 
rodos@nospam.haywood.org | f u cn rd ths, u cn gt a gd jb n cmptr prgmmng. [Anon]
Camion Technology | 
+61 2 9873 5105   | 

--
SLUG - Sydney Linux Users Group Mailing List - http://www.slug.org.au
To unsubscribe send email to slug-request@nospam.slug.org.au with
unsubscribe in the text

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [SLUG] Hi posters.
  - From: Matthew Dalton <matthewd@nospam.research.canon.com.au>

References:
- Re: [SLUG] Hi posters.
  - From: Matt Allen <Matt@nospam.LinuxWorx.com.au>

Prev by Date: [SLUG] Re: Tools for documentation.
Next by Date: [SLUG] uptimes
Prev by thread: Re: [SLUG] Hi posters.
Next by thread: Re: [SLUG] Hi posters.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread