[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [SLUG] [OT] repeaters & hubs ##

To: DaZZa <dazza@nospam.zip.com.au>,George Vieira <georgev@nospam.citadelcomputer.com.au>
Subject: RE: [SLUG] [OT] repeaters & hubs ##
From: Alexander Else <coram@nospam.cyberchrist.org>
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2000 13:17:53 +1000
Cc: slug@nospam.slug.org.au
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10006050935330.2331-100000@nospam.zipperii.zip.com.au>
References: <03F12E3EFB51D311837F0000E860EB491E0ADC@nospam.cittech>
Sender: owner-slug@nospam.newtreno.spectrum.com.au

At 09:37 AM 6/5/00 +1000, DaZZa wrote:
>As far as collisions go - there's the same chance using a hub as there is
>using a repeater - which is entirely network traffic dependant. The only
>devices which will reduce your level of collisions are routers
>{overkill!}, and switches.

and bridges.


--
Alexander Else
http://cyberchrist.org

--
SLUG - Sydney Linux Users Group Mailing List - http://www.slug.org.au
To unsubscribe send email to slug-request@nospam.slug.org.au with
unsubscribe in the text

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [SLUG] [OT] repeaters & hubs ##
  - From: DaZZa <dazza@nospam.zip.com.au>

References:
- RE: [SLUG] [OT] repeaters & hubs ##
  - From: George Vieira <georgev@nospam.citadelcomputer.com.au>
- RE: [SLUG] [OT] repeaters & hubs ##
  - From: DaZZa <dazza@nospam.zip.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: [SLUG] wget with proxy authentication
Next by Date: [SLUG] 1800-LINUX: Creating a Free Linux-only ISP
Prev by thread: Re: [SLUG] [OT] repeaters & hubs ##
Next by thread: RE: [SLUG] [OT] repeaters & hubs ##
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread