[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[SLUG] slocate

To: slug <slug@nospam.slug.org.au>
Subject: [SLUG] slocate
From: Gregg <gsuaning@nospam.acay.com.au>
Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2000 23:38:07 +1100
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10001010735050.17740-100000@nospam.hero.lannet.com.au> <20000101132150.J1528@nospam.freebie.lemis.com> <386DD1EF.ED83BAB5@nospam.med.usyd.edu.au>
Sender: owner-slug@nospam.newtreno.spectrum.com.au

Anyone know why slocate might start without my asking? My mp3s sounded like
they had the hiccups so I looked at the processes running - two slocates
had been running and chewing up about 33% of the cpu each.

The amount of time they had been running leads me to belive that I didn't
start them and after thinking about it, may have started on the roll over.
Anyone else get this (RH6.0)??

Perplexed (aka Gregg)






--
SLUG - Sydney Linux Users Group Mailing List - http://www.slug.org.au
To unsubscribe send email to slug-request@nospam.slug.org.au with
unsubscribe in the text

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [SLUG] slocate
  - From: "Andrew Morton" <morton@nospam.nortelnetworks.com>
- Re: [SLUG] slocate
  - From: Michael Lake <Mike.Lake@nospam.uts.edu.au>
- Re: [SLUG] slocate
  - From: Alexander Else <aelse@nospam.ozemail.com.au>
- Re: [SLUG] slocateRe: [SLUG] slocate
  - From: Michael Lake <Mike.Lake@nospam.uts.edu.au>Michael Lake <Mike.Lake@nospam.uts.edu.au>
- Re: [SLUG] slocateRe: [SLUG] slocate
  - From: "Andrew Morton" <morton@nospam.nortelnetworks.com>"Andrew Morton" <morton@nospam.nortelnetworks.com>

References:
- Re: [SLUG] Re: [Oz-ISP] Y2K precautions
  - From: Richard PIper <rpiper@nospam.med.usyd.edu.au>

Prev by Date: [SLUG] Fairfax IT picked up LinuxToday hoax :-)
Next by Date: Re: [SLUG] Aah - good to see that Y2K hasn\\\'t changedsomethings.
Prev by thread: Re: [SLUG] Re: [Oz-ISP] Y2K precautionsRe: [SLUG] Re: [Oz-ISP] Y2K precautions
Next by thread: Re: [SLUG] slocate
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread