[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ProgSoc] SSH & Sutekh

To: Bryn Davies <curious@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [ProgSoc] SSH & Sutekh
From: Robert Howard <rhoward@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 09:31:38 +1000
Cc: progsoc@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040826225827.GA30061@progsoc.uts.edu.au>
List-archive: <http://www.progsoc.uts.edu.au/lists/progsoc/>
List-id: <progsoc.progsoc.uts.edu.au>
References: <20040826225827.GA30061@progsoc.uts.edu.au>
Sender: owner-progsoc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i

On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 08:58:27AM +1000, Bryn Davies wrote:
>  Does anyone else still get this problem where when trying to connect to
> Sutekh ( kind of implied at the moment ) they can't authenticate using
> Putty, while the same credentials work just fine if they ssh somewhere
> else first, and then ssh to Sutekh?  Wasn't a problem with Trogdor,
> would be interested to hear if it's bothering anyone else.

You're not the only one.

I think it has something to do with the version of SSH that putty is...
err... Using? Emulating?  I'm not sure if it's still stuck in the dark
ages of version 1.

Rob H

-
You are subscribed to the progsoc mailing list. To unsubscribe, send a
message containing "unsubscribe" to progsoc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
If you are having trouble, ask owner-progsoc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for help.

References:
- [ProgSoc] SSH & Sutekh
  - From: Bryn Davies

Prev by Date: [ProgSoc] SSH & Sutekh
Next by Date: [ProgSoc] Why don't we ever come up with things like this?
Previous by thread: [ProgSoc] SSH & Sutekh
Next by thread: Re: [ProgSoc] SSH & Sutekh
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread