[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ProgSoc] Windows thread communication?
On Fri, May 26, 2000 at 10:29:20AM +1000, Nigel Sheridan-Smith wrote:
> Many Windows messages rely on a return value or pass pointers to data... In
> this case you will have to find some other way of doing it because pointers
> can't be guaranteed to be valid unless its synchronous. How about a shared
Why won't the pointers be valid? All the threads run in the same memory
space. If I pass a pointer to some data it should be fine for the
reciever to read that data. (Assuming that the memory that the pointer
points to is still valid.)
You are subscribed to the progsoc mailing list. To unsubscribe, send a
message containing "unsubscribe" to email@example.com.
If you are having trouble, ask firstname.lastname@example.org for help.