[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ProgSoc] the gimp
On Thu, 22 Apr 1999, Telford Tendys wrote:
> > }video codecs are a different issue to still pictures but I hope we are
> > }not talking about putting video onto web pages.
> > and why not? :)
> Well to but it simply, anyone who is going to wait an hour or so watching
Yeah but considering they've now made half-decent codecs with which to
watch video at 28800 (with the emphasis on half), to be using this same
technology to encode still pictures, would transfer quite a benefit.
I was only advocating it for this use :)
You are subscribed to the progsoc mailing list. To unsubscribe, send a
message containing "unsubscribe" to email@example.com.
If you are having trouble, ask firstname.lastname@example.org for help.
This list is archived at <http://www.progsoc.uts.edu.au/lists/progsoc/>