Re: [ProgSoc] the gimp

[Christian Kent <ckent@nospam.socs.uts.edu.au>]

On Thu, 22 Apr 1999, Telford Tendys wrote:

> > }video codecs are a different issue to still pictures but I hope we are
> > }not talking about putting video onto web pages.
> > and why not? :)
> Well to but it simply, anyone who is going to wait an hour or so watching

Yeah but considering they've now made half-decent codecs with which to
watch video at 28800 (with the emphasis on half), to be using this same
technology to encode still pictures, would transfer quite a benefit.

I was only advocating it for this use  :)

CK.

--
You are subscribed to the progsoc mailing list. To unsubscribe, send a
message containing "unsubscribe" to progsoc-request@nospam.progsoc.uts.edu.au.
If you are having trouble, ask owner-progsoc@nospam.progsoc.uts.edu.au for help.

This list is archived at <http://www.progsoc.uts.edu.au/lists/progsoc/>