> > >> Now you're criticizing TFM? It is not "mostly photocopied".
> > >
> > >Guess you should read it. As just a very small example:
> > >
> > > TFM1995 volume1:page 48-49 (customising the C shell)
> > > TFM1996 page 60-61 (customising the C shell)
> > >
> > >Note the 'similar' content?
> > >Originaly effort..or just the effort of reproducing?
> >
> > Yes well written documentations should be kept from year to year. If it's
> > photocopied from previous Progsoc member's work fantastic.
>
> But u said "it is not "mostly photocopied"", make up your mind pls, does
> it have large photocopied sections or not?
Oh, just grow up! You are such a fucking MORON!
Of course there is going to be retention of previous years' content. If you
buy a second edition of a book, do you not expect that there is an overlap
in content with the first edition? Grow a brain or shut the fuck up!
> After my negative experinece with the excutive (detailed in a pervious
> e-mail), i had assumed they wouldn't want to know me.
TFM has little to do with the executive. If you have something useful to
contribute, let Piers know and he'd have included it.
> Are the people of Sun and SOCS so xenophobic? Will they treat us with
> scorn and mistrust? Perhaps if you extend your smear campaign u could
> convince them of how evil we r?
No, but they're doing ProgSoc LOTS of favours on an ongoing basis, so it
is their prerogative to cease handing out these favours at any time, for
any reason.
Peter
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Meric pmeric@nospam.socs.uts.edu.au
pmeric@nospam.progsoc.uts.edu.au
pmeric@nospam.vislab.usyd.edu.au
http://www.progsoc.uts.edu.au/~pmeric