Re: ftoomsh?

Cam Dorrington (cam@nospam.progsoc.uts.edu.au)
Thu, 18 Jul 1996 17:49:05 +1000 (EST)

On Thu, 18 Jul 1996, Peter Meric wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Jul 1996, Ryan Heise wrote:
> > If the progsoc exec truly think that the behaviour of ftoomsh over the past
> > few days has been acceptable (or unavoidable due to time/funds or whatever)
> > then I suppose I will have to trust what they are doing behind that screen,
> > although it would be nice (like someone suggested) for us members to know a
> > little about whats going on.
>
> Oh dear. I thought this guy was joking when he said something like "that
> just not good enough, is it?".
>
> What is he going on about!?!?! Ftoomsh is bound to have its fair share
> of problems, especially considering the heritage of the equipment. Let's
> be reasonable--the admins are doing a good job in keeping ftoomsh up
> and running.

Thanks Peter for what I think is the first bit of praise I have ever heard
in regards to progsoc admin people.

Cam.