Re: ftoomsh?

Cam Dorrington (cam@nospam.progsoc.uts.edu.au)
Wed, 17 Jul 1996 23:25:37 +1000 (EST)

On Wed, 17 Jul 1996, Ryan Heise wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jul 1996, HotStuff (aka Dinesh) wrote:
> > For some time now, I have been noticing that ftoomsh is playing up! isn't
> > it time we had a secondary server??
>
> It works fine sometimes.
I think you should replace sometimes with most of the time.

>That's nowhere good enough is it?
Well maybe you dont think it is good enough, but for $10 i think it is
pretty damn good to get what progsoc offers. If you arent satisfied you
are getting your moneys worth then why pay it.

>Lately, everything seems to have fallen apart.
Since when and what ? Please tell me what constitutes everything.

>Speaking of hardware backup, what is a machine doing fully devoted to
>talkers?

The link from talking about hardware backup to a machine fully devoted to
talkers somehow evades me at the moment, but, what i would really like to
know is which machine you are referring to here that is 'fully' devoted to
talkers.

Cam.