Re: Addressing Mail

pmeric@nospam.vnet.IBM.COM
Wed, 20 Dec 95 18:23:14 EST

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Ryan Shelswell: "Re: cause for concern... Good Weekend letter"
Previous message: Joshua Graham Pitcher: "Re: Addressing Mail"
Maybe in reply to: pmeric@nospam.vnet.IBM.COM: "Addressing Mail"

*** Reply to note of 12/21/95 09:29
From: Peter Meric +61-2-353-3889 DP13
Project Assistant - IT Consulting
ISSC Australia
Subject: Re: Addressing Mail

Oh, give me a fucking break!!!

I was being facetious!!!

Okay, it really doesn't take very long to delete messages, and YES, it
does cost someone lots of money if you transfer lots of duplicates of
mail, and YES, the WWW traffic is MUCH MUCH greater. I know.

I don't think there is any justification to complain about REALLY
HUGE .sigs anymore, based on the recent posts to progsoc. Isn't
bandwidth one of the major reasons large .sigs are discouraged, as well
as the fact that they're annoying??? Well, they're at the bottom of
the message... just press 'q' (or whatever).

Peter
ISSCAUS(PMERIC) pmeric@nospam.vnet.ibm.com
IBMMAIL(AUIBMDUP)

Next message: Ryan Shelswell: "Re: cause for concern... Good Weekend letter"
Previous message: Joshua Graham Pitcher: "Re: Addressing Mail"
Maybe in reply to: pmeric@nospam.vnet.IBM.COM: "Addressing Mail"