is that generated at everyone in progsoc? or just the executive or the
mindless users who are mistreating the system?
> be conditional on the IRCings of mindless brats.
> I understand that egos may have been involved with the decision to cut
> off ftoomsh - that's OK, just uninvolve them, everyone makes mistakes,
where and how does ego come into it? Its not like we have a choice, or is
it you and J have a persecution complex.
> we sympathise; but keeping it off the net "indefinitely" is going to
> make things much worse.
I agree, "indefinitely" is too long. I think there should be an agree
upon time that ftoomsh can be brought back onto the net. However a lot
of issues have to be resolved before that happens. As it stands, jenny
has requested we stay off for at least two weeks.
> >The decision has been made. If you dont like it then take
> >it up with Jenny Edwards or the VC.
> What is this supposed to be - accountable representation?
> I would not want to bother Jenny Edwards with the machinations of progsoc -
she is already involved .. If you feel so strongly about it, form a group
of your peers and present a case to her. It probably wouldnt be that bad an
> the reconnection of ftoomsh is a matter for its admins, who should be
> taking appropriate remedial action, ASAP, not its users. What the hell are
What action has the users taken? How is Whining going to help the
reconnection of ftoomsh.
-- Phil Shead firstname.lastname@example.org Ph: +61-2-417-1864.