> On Sun, 12 Mar 1995, Ryan Shelswell wrote:
> > On Sat, 11 Mar 1995, Piers wrote:
> > > On Fri, 10 Mar 1995, Ryan Shelswell wrote:
> > >=20
> > > > It's probably too late to change it now: however, with better plan=
> > > > this could be avoided next year.
> > >=20
> > > Patronising bastard.
> > Would you care to prove or justify that on any grounds?
> Prove you're a patronising bastard? Oh, I see what you mean. Well, the
> ProgSoc elections last year were hardly any more organised, and the
> CompSoc elections *this* year are less organised.Considering that ProgSoc
> achieved more last year than in any other of its history, I think your
> words both untrue and self-serving.=20
> > > I for one think we shouldn't vote for anyone who
> > > complains to the dean about a progsoc member's WWW page.=20
> > > Hmmm, Ryan?
> > I can only assume your bitchy accusation refers to Tom's home
> > page. I haven't talked to the dean in months, and certainly
> > didn't complain about it.
> My comment was about nothing you said, but what someone else said. If
> there's a connection (i.e. if you are the deprecator), then so be it. I
> cannot see any explicit accusation in what I wrote, nor do I recall you
> actually saying you would complain about the page in question, rather tha=
> you "thought someone might complain about it". If you meant the former,
> perhaps you should have said that (but as you didn't, you didn't have to)=
> > Try getting possessed of a clue instead.
> A-hah! My first clue! [The Great Detective examines the fragment of
> distinctive tweed with a masonic pin and trinchipolly ashes (again)]
> I don't think we need this animosity; coincidences are strange things.
> firstname.lastname@example.org email@example.com
> "Manon me dit 'non', mais moi je l'aime" - Manon des Sources
piers and ryan - I don't know who you two guys are but I didn't think
that progsoc was the same message area as flame..... I very recently got
involved in a nice flame on a bbs that ended up going for 3 days with about
15 messages a day - the trick is if you think someone is being a dickhead
try criticising what they are doing rather than getting personal and=20
criticising who they are....... for god sake no club is going to get any
better with bitching going on......what ended up happening with my little
flame war was that we degenerated into open swearing ( I asked the other gu=
to keep to the arguement rather than start on personal crap but when he=20
didn't I lost all self control myself - the point is it wasn't exactly=20
constructive and in the end we had to work out an agreement just so we
could keep civil...that was a bbs and I never really had to see him much)
Now this is a club right???? Personal attacks flying back and forth by=20
members is going to make is a shit of a club......in short debate the issue=
=DB "There are more things in ]
=DB heaven and earth, Horatio, Catchya Later!!!!! ]
=DB Than are dreamt of in ]
=DB your philosophy." ]
=DB Sammy ]
=DB Hamlet Act I Scene V ]