> On Fri, 10 Mar 1995, Ryan Shelswell wrote:
> > While I agree it's not new for this problem to arise, I wouldn't
> > expect anyone to argue that it's good. Obviously, it's difficult
> > to give 1st years a feeling of inclusion in ProgSoc when the elections
> > were held without them. It also makes it fairly pointless to be
> > talking about "1st year representatives".
> > It's probably too late to change it now: however, with better planning,
> > this could be avoided next year.
> Patronising bastard.
Would you care to prove or justify that on any grounds?
> I for one think we shouldn't vote for anyone who
> complains to the dean about a progsoc member's WWW page.
> Hmmm, Ryan?
I can only assume your bitchy accusation refers to Tom's home
page. I haven't talked to the dean in months, and certainly
didn't complain about it.
> When in possession of all the facts, obtuse discussions make more sense.
Try getting possessed of a clue instead.