This has become a discussion about news readers...

Piers Edmund Johnson (piers@nospam.socs.uts.EDU.AU)
Thu, 29 Sep 1994 16:37:08 +1000

On Thu, 29 Sep 1994, Tim Sadler proposed:

> Someone once uttered:
>
> > If it's a choice between nn and tin, I'll take nn (I'd even
> > take pine's news reading abilitles over tin!)
>
> The simple fact of the matter is that tin is much easier to use than nn
> no matter how much people dislike it. I vote for tin, but if I absolutely
> have to I'll consider using nn, BUT only if I *have* to!!!
>
How can it be easier to use if so many people dislike it?
Liking software usually depends on its ease of utility - if the interface
sucks, you hate it. tin's interface sucks, I hate it. (easy, isn't it?)
Anyway, ftoomsh is for having fun on, not for using irritating news readers
on. (How about we get back to some other thread?)
I still don't see why we can't have rn.
| |
_| |_
\ /
\/
________________________________________________________________
piers@nospam.socs.uts.edu.au (informal) "We could all be wrong."
kaleid@nospam.ftoomsh.socs.uts.edu.au (progsoc) - Laurie Anderson
pejohnso@nospam.itd.uts.edu.au (flames)
http://ftoomsh.socs.uts.edu.au/~kaleid/ (WWW home page)
Piers Johnson, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia.