Re: RFC: 1994 ProgSoc Equipment Budget

James Richard Webster (jrwebste@nospam.socs.uts.EDU.AU)
Mon, 6 Jun 1994 13:49:46 +1000 (EST)

On Sat, 4 Jun 1994, Peter William Lees wrote:

> also - on the modem debate: modems would be a good idea on ftoomsh, but not for
> shell connections - UUCP and/or SLIP/PPP would be better, as these facilities
> are harder to come by for most members, and have some interesting technical
> components that some people like to fiddle with.
>

So, that means that ProgSoc members would be able to use ftoomsh as their
SL/IP or PPP feed for their site (if they wished to set one up...). YES!
Do it! I personally am persuing the idea of setting up a node on the
InterNet, but find that currently my only real option is via APANA,but
(while they have the right idea about making INet access public) I find
some of their restrictions are a little ... um restrictive; particularly
the requirement for one's machine to be left on 24 hours a day. Anyone
else interested in this?

Regards,
James

-- jrwebste@nospam.socs.uts.edu.au (James 'Woody' Webster in real life)
E-mail or FINGER for PGP public key....

"If all mankind minus one were of one opinion, and only one person were
of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing
that one person than he, if he had the power, would be justified in
silencing mankind." - John Stuart Mill