Re: Ftoomsh MUD?

James Wondrasek (jimmy@nospam.socs.uts.EDU.AU)
Fri, 15 Apr 1994 14:05:05 +1000 (EST)

On Fri, 15 Apr 1994, James Richard Webster wrote:

> On the Message of the Day regarding 'ftoomsh' (that is still there,
> incidentally. Doesn't anyone ever delete the old messages from that thing?
> I think we have all read it by now! But I digress...) we are supposed to
> be getting a MUD on the new machine. What are the developments regarding
> this(if any?). What sort of MUD is it going to be(MUSH,MUSE,etc,etc)?
>
> Awaiting your words of wonder,
> James 'Woody' Webster

None at the moment. I will add your name to the list of people interested
in running the MUD and once things are up and running, perhaps even
beforehand, we will get discussion started. Better yet, we will get it
started now.

If you are interested in participating in the running of the ProgSoc MUD and
want to join a mail-group for such an activity, send me your email address.
This isn't going to be a mailing-list, just a CC: and alias based mail-group.
After I think I have everyone's addresses, I will mail the list to
everyone involved so they can stick it in their address books.

Ftoomsh is running, I've converted to C2 but with auditing turned off. Now
all we need is the usage policy statement and a few administration scripts.
If anyone has any ideas of what should be included in the usage policy to
keep SoCS and Arpanet happy, let's here it. As we will be telling the
users what we expect from them I think there should also be a section
where we tell the users what they can expect from the sys admin's.
Uninterrupted service will _definitely_ not be one of them. Not until we
get another machine, anyway...

Jimmy