| Computerised Video Image Enhancement
| How "facial experts" working for the NSW Police help to "up" the arrest rate.
|
| Fare Free Day
| 2004 CityRail. With photos and trip planner.
|
| Sydney 2000
| The Games of the XXVII Olympiad, and what I've done to 'em.
|
| Mayne Ad
| Advertisement starring bits of the UTS Tower building. For no particular reason.
|
| Megahertz Overview
| A highly simplified comparison graph of the Pentium, PowerPC and AMD from 1994-2002.
|
| The Matrix
| Movie starring Keanu Reeves, lots of special effects, and the Sydney skyline.
|
| ITPD
| Fun, fun, fun, a daytrip to Canberra in the name of capstone subject research.
|
| Pornography
| I used to say something serious here, but people kept thinking I had a real
collection of images behind this link.
|
| Net Fanatic, Anad
| Lots of web page close-ups, typing hands, not-quite-nude photos with blur filters and lewd animal acts star
next to Anand Kumria, who is a guest on Today Tonight, but only gets 26 words in, including an "um". (Requires QuickTime 4).
|
| |
Some of the web sites featured in this article include:
- http://www.dogpile.com
- http://www.google.com
- http://www.totse.com/files/FA031/22kill.htm
- http://www.erowid.org/chemicals/
- http://www.erowid.org/chemicals/heroin/heroin.shtml
- http://www.erowid.org/chemicals/lsd/lsd.shtml
- http://www.erowid.org/chemicals/mdma/mdma.shtml
- http://www.erowid.org/chemicals/mdma/mdma_basics.shtml
- http://www.erowid.org/chemicals/mdma/mdma_images.shtml
- http://www.erowid.org/chemicals/mdma/mdma_images2.shtml
- http://www.entertainment.seven.com.au
Internet Filters
Reporter: Helen Wellings
After a lot of debate last year on pornography and
offensive material on the internet, controversial new laws
came into effect in January this year, designed to protect
young minds.
Instead of the government banning X-rated and R-rated
sites, they decided to give the Australian Broadcasting
Authority $7 million to implement a policy of "protected
access." That entailed such measures as an industry Code
of Practice, including approval of internet filters.
Software filters are supposed to block out inappropriate
sites, in response to a database of taboo words and
images.
But tests conducted by PC User magazine on 10 of the 16
approved filters showed most of the leading programs DID
allow offensive material through....violence, profanity nudity,
partial, full nudity all sorts of different categories....... without
parents even realising. The tests covered filters which are
designed to sift while kids surf ... not those which provide
pre-approved quarantined sites especially programmed
for children.
"Many of these filters fail to do what they claim to do," says
John Hilvert, Deputy Editor of PC User magazine. He
showed how easy it is to access offensive and illegal
information that's totally unsuitable for kids. "They're very
primitive they will do some things but on the whole they'll be
very disappointed if you think this is an alternative to
supervising your child's surfing on the net, says John.
Of concern are the drug advocacy sites which give
chemical information tips for safe shooting, how to get
high, how to make your own deadly potions; bomb sites for
destructive purposes, race hate sites, erotica and
pornography.... all dangerous information in the wrong
hands.
PC User Magazine tested 10 government approved filters
for their effectiveness, to see if they allowed or blocked
access to unsuitable sites.
6 of the 10 filters tested did not block drug advocacy sites.
Pornography & erotica - the tests found MOST filters
opened the door to all sorts of sites you mightn't want your
kids to explore. 7 allowed access to lewd animal acts!
Race hate sites - 4 filters let you in. Bomb recipes for
destructive purposes - 2 ACCEPTED those sites.
"Net Nanny is probably the weakest and the most feeble of
the lot definitely ...... Kid's friends might say there's a really
interesting site you should see and they'll just click
through," says John Hilvert.
Net Nanny costs fifty dollars ... like most filters though, it's
provided FREE by some internet providers to "protect"
young users. But it stopped only ONE of the porn sites and
accepted all of the drug advocacy ones.
The biggest problem with these filters is that they can be
easily disabled, and information on the net tells you how to
do it.
Another problem with many filters is that they block useful
or educational sites. You might need to access material for
homework, say on biology or race relations but the filter
classifies those topics as taboo and won't let you in.
For example if you look up nuclear bombs in world war 2,
or information on breast cancer, these sites are blocked by
many filters because they contain taboo words or images,
as the PC User tests show.
Peter Coroneos of the Internet Industry Association
acknowledges the imperfections.
"It's not farcical, it just represents the current state of the
technology. The public should understand that the software
does not replace parental supervision it's designed to work
alongside it."
The best adviceÉ
¤ Have child access to the net in a high traffic area like the
lounge or kitchen.
¤ Consider subscribing to an enclosed or quarantined
station especially designed as suitable for kids.
á Have a password and change it as your child learns to
responsibly use the net ...or
á use a filter with a TRACKING mode .. to track sites
visited, rather than just block them.
|